OK I may need help on this one because for the life of me I can't seem to understand, so here goes....
So I just read that Lauryn Hill is going to prison for 3 months for not paying her back Taxes. So you mean to tell me it's better to have her in prison for non-payment of Taxes oppose to just allowing her to pay the money and be done with it. I mean not only are you prolonging getting paid back but you are also taking a mother away from her 6 kids. Now the reason this is so hard for me to understand is because you have Lindsay Lohan out here running a muck all over the dang place and out of all the crimes she's committed including but not limited to violation of probation and refusal to go and stay in court ordered rehab. I mean since when could you dictate if you would or would not go to a court ordered place. I want to know why rules and laws are enforced for some but not for all. She has no kids to take care of and to be frank she is really a hazard to herself and others. I can not figure out why her parents, lawyers and judges refuse to see this child for the train wreck that she is. I mean lets be real here how many of us could do half of what she's done and get away with it. I mean go to court and flip off a judge and I can guarantee you that you will be found in contempt and thrown in jail for a little while. So why is it that she continues to get these get out of jail free passes with no responsibilities but a person who has 6 kids depending on them to take care of them has to go to jail for 3 months for not paying all their back taxes. I mean I guess the nine hundred thousand wasn't enough to keep a mother at home with her kids but being a complete reckless idiot can keep you free from rehab and prison.
SMH.....and like I said I just never will understand it so if you all can help me please try but I doubt if you all can explain it either.
So please explain to me what the difference is?
No comments:
Post a Comment